Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacqueline Bobak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — kikichugirl ^oh hello! 05:44, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Jacqueline Bobak

Jacqueline Bobak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is probably a talented and capable singer; but she appears not to come close to meeting WP:ACADEMIC. The world is chock-full of talented and capable singers holding down teaching jobs to survive; they are not notable. Ms Bobak has no in-depth coverage in reliable source to support her notability. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:24, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

• Keep Although not apparently notable as an academic administrator, she may well pass WP:GNG as a performing artist because of brief (a sentence or two,) but favorable reviews of her performance in reviews of concerts, operas in which she was a soloist. I linked a couple of reviews from Variety and Los Angeles Times to the page. There were more.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:26, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (spiel) @ 20:15, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

• Keep per WP:HEY. The reviews at Variety and the LA Times are substantial enough to push her over the GNG threshold. Bearian (talk) 00:30, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.